Therefore, when encountering the debate on the presence of the discriminative statements in MMPI-2 for the first time, I took the opposition side, convinced in the invalidity of the inventory to replicate the results. (2009) challenged my perception of the racial bias definition.Įarlier I did not take into account the role of natural distinctions existing between different racial and social groups, interpreting possible inconsistencies in sample characteristics as the researcher’s bias.
More specifically, findings of Monnot et al. Though aware of the issue of racial bias in psychological assessments, I was not fully knowledgeable about the significance of external criteria, clinical settings, and patient populations in the research, before reading this article. Logical organization and scientific precision of the research increases its reliability in the eyes of the reader. Coherent and concise, the summary of the findings is presented in the chronological order.
TAKE MMPI 2 TEST FREE FREE
The paper is free of jargons, politically insensitive language, and collocations. The syntax is mostly limited to simple sentences, written in the active voice and present tense, which increases the readability of the paper. Such quantitative approach allows readers to compare data more efficiently, contributing to the accuracy of the suggested ideas. (2009) use many visuals, in particular, figures and tables summarizing the information. When presenting their results, Monnot et al.
Such a broad review of the material signifies a high level of analysis from numerous perspectives. In their study, researchers refer both to the pilot studies, conducted in 1950, and most recent experiments in the 2000s. (2009) give an overview of opposing opinions on the matter from the literature. Before reporting the newly discovered ideas on the MMPI-2, Monnot et al. In this case, the test’s failure to identify the corresponding symptoms is connected to the differences in sample characteristics rather than racial belonging.Ī summary of the study’s findings provides sufficient evidence to argue that the analyzed text exhibits accurate and complete ideas with an appropriate formal tone and scientifically precise language. (2009), the current status of the inventory proved ineffective in predicting the diagnostic status of male veterans, addicted to substances. Instead of focusing on racial bias when criticizing the MMPI-2, psychologists should ponder the implications of social inclusion in the existing testing method. By this, I mean that the process of replicating the results of the previous studies requires an introduction of the external criteria which do not necessarily apply to all social groups. By using relatively new Restructured Clinical scales, researchers found that the observed inconsistency in the MMPI-2 evaluation heavily depends on the criterion types, clinical setting, and patient population (Monnot et al., 2009). The scientists assumed that this technique might allow them to prove that mean differences in the previously conducted experiments on the matter are better explained with the natural differences between groups rather than racial bias. (2009) aimed at testing both of the hypotheses by applying racial bias to different clinical settings, patient populations, and relevant clinical criteria. While some psychologists argue that the self-report inventory contains a set of discriminative statements, others oppose this belief, pointing to the empirical evidence disregarding the nature of the aforementioned argument.
Previously criticized for being biased toward racial minorities, MMPI-2 raises a heated debate in the scientific community. However, a brief analysis of the study’s findings in the context of contemporary issues in psychological assessment suggests that current evaluations of MMPI-2 prove to be valid and reliable, excluding the role of racial bias.
0 kommentar(er)
